Were are we on this?
---
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >
> >This has got portability issues (fopen("ab"))
> >
> My doc says b is ignored on ansi systems, and recommends using it. Do
> you have other experience
Tom Lane wrote:
This has got portability issues (fopen("ab"))
My doc says b is ignored on ansi systems, and recommends using it. Do
you have other experiences?
and I don't care for its
use of malloc in preference to palloc either.
Do we already have an applicable memory context in the postmast
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The attached patch has the default filename issue fixed, and
> > documentation. Since I don't have a doc build system functional, there
> > might be tag mismatches or other typos; please check. IMHO this should
> > be committed with
Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch has the default filename issue fixed, and
> documentation. Since I don't have a doc build system functional, there
> might be tag mismatches or other typos; please check. IMHO this should
> be committed without waiting for log rotati
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I was thinking of close/reopen so log files
could be rotated.
Log file rotation is fine, if we find a consensus quite soon how to
implement it... Seems as if I might find some time to implement it until
feature freeze.
The attached patch has the default filename issue fix
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually, my idea of sending a message to stderr saying we are using a
> > pre-configured file is so folks aren't surprised by the fact they can't
> > see any stderr anymore.
>
> Hm? I thought we'd just established that the patch was
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, my idea of sending a message to stderr saying we are using a
> pre-configured file is so folks aren't surprised by the fact they can't
> see any stderr anymore.
Hm? I thought we'd just established that the patch wasn't going to
suppress output
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Sorry I didn't get back on this earlier, yesterday morning my internet
> access was literally struck by lightning, I'm running temporary hardware
> now.
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
> mentioned
Sorry I didn't get back on this earlier, yesterday morning my internet
access was literally struck by lightning, I'm running temporary hardware
now.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
mentioned in postgresql.conf doesn't match the actual d
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
> >>mentioned in postgresql.conf doesn't match the actual default.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I'm really not happy with the concept t
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
mentioned in postgresql.conf doesn't match the actual default.
I'm really not happy with the concept that the postmaster overrides
its stderr direction.
I agre
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
mentioned in postgresql.conf doesn't match the actual default.
I'm really not happy with the concept that the postmaster overrides
its stderr direction.
Me ei
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
> mentioned in postgresql.conf doesn't match the actual default.
I'm really not happy with the concept that the postmaster overrides
its stderr direction.
reg
Oh, it would need doc additions. I can do that when I apply, or you can
resubmit.
---
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> >Specifically about the logs, I still think there is a lot of value to
> >being able t
Looks good to me. The only issue I saw was that the default file name
mentioned in postgresql.conf doesn't match the actual default.
Is this ready to be added to the patch queue?
---
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Magnus Hagander
15 matches
Mail list logo
