[HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2

2007-02-19 Thread Pavan Deolasee
Reposting - looks like the message did not get through in the first attempt. My apologies if multiple copies are received. This is the next version of the HOT WIP patch. Since the last patch that I sent out, I have implemented the HOT-update chain pruning mechanism. When following a HOT-update

Re: [HACKERS] Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes

2007-02-19 Thread Robert Treat
On Monday 19 February 2007 11:27, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 05:10:36PM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > > > RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those wheels > > > when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to sit on top > > > of. > >

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

2007-02-19 Thread Pavel Stehule
Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I miss doc for this operator > > > > Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in > > PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. > > Here's the reason -- see this

Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 1

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:36 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-02-15 kell 10:49, kirjutas Heikki > Linnakangas: > > > We already log tuple removals by normal vacuums. We can't use that wal > > entry as it is: if a dead tuple is in the middle of an update chain, it > > needs

Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 1

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 10:49 +, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Do we actually ever want to remove dead tuples from the middle of the > chain? If a tuple in the middle of the chain is dead, surely every tuple > before it in the chain is dead as well, and we want to remove them as > well. I'm thi

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

2007-02-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nobody worked on this subject a lot of years. Who need it, knows about it > and use it. I am for this topic is documented and in doc is note about > difference from standard and about some incompletness of this operator. Once we document it there's g

Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2

2007-02-19 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2007-02-20 kell 12:08, kirjutas Pavan Deolasee: > > Reposting - looks like the message did not get through in the first > attempt. My apologies if multiple copies are received. > > > This is the next version of the HOT WIP patch. Since the last patch > that > I sent out, I

<    1   2