Re: [HACKERS] Streaming Replication on win32

2010-01-24 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> 2010/1/24 Joe Conway : >>> Sorry for being thick -- I'm still missing something. I don't understand >>> why any user program using libpq/PQexec running on Windows does not have >>> the same issue. Or to put it another way, why does this only apply to >>

Re: [HACKERS] default_language

2010-01-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't > have a parameter called "default_language"? According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION is SQL. Should we implement that? -- Sent via pgsq

Re: [HACKERS] default_language

2010-01-24 Thread Pavel Stehule
2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +, Simon Riggs wrote: >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't >> have a parameter called "default_language"? > > According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION > is SQL.  Should

Re: [HACKERS] default_language

2010-01-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On mån, 2010-01-25 at 08:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : > > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't > >> have a parameter called "default_language"? > > > > According to the SQL s

Re: [HACKERS] default_language

2010-01-24 Thread Pavel Stehule
2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : > On mån, 2010-01-25 at 08:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : >> > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +, Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't >> >> have a parameter called "default_langua

Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: In HS, Startup process sets SIGALRM when waiting for buffer pin.

2010-01-24 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 21:40 +, Greg Stark wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>> What is your proposed way of handling buffer pin deadlocks? That will be >>> acceptable and working to some extent in the next week? >>> >>> Wait forever isn't alway

<    1   2