Dave,
I share your concerns about this functionality. In fact last month I
wrote the following in response to a patch to this functionality.
I wouldn't mind this being pulled out of the main code line for now and
moved to contrib until it becomes more robust.
>>Robert,
>>
>>
>>Thanks for
| "Dave Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| There are much better products out there with much better functionality
|
| See http://www.ambysoft.com/persistenceLayer.html
|
| I personally use Artom Rudoy's persistence layer
|
| www.sourceforge.net/projects/player
Turbine at jakarta.apache.or
c);
exc.printStackTrace();
}finally{
try {
if (conn != null) conn.close();
} catch (Exception ex){
;
}
}
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Tony Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 5, 2001 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: jdbc list
Su
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 14:57, Dave Cramer wrote:
> While fixing the handling of "unknown" data type in the result set I was
> faced with wading through the Serialize code.
>
> I am wondering if this is really a required/desireable feature?
>
> How many people out there are actually using it?
>
>
While fixing the handling of "unknown" data type in the result set I was
faced with wading through the Serialize code.
I am wondering if this is really a required/desireable feature?
How many people out there are actually using it?
Do we need/want it?
My thoughts are:
1) There are plenty of p
e row id of an entry in the myurl table.
Can these object capabilities work?
I'm interested in this because I've been playing around with the JDBC
Serialize/PreparedStatment classes. I've been hacking Serialize and
PreparedStatement.java in the distribution and got it to store
OK here is code :
Ziu z = new Ziu();
Class.forName("org.postgresql.Driver");
db = DriverManager.getConnection(url, usr, pwd);
Serialize.create((org.postgresql.Connection) db,z.getClass());
Serialize s = new Serialize((org.postgresql.Connection) db,
Does anybody was succesful in using "new Serialize( con , s)" constructor ?
I always have "NullPointerException".
--
MS is not the answer.
MS is the question.
NO (or Linux) is the answer.
:) Jarek (:
