On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
>
> http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
Are you sure Bruce? I'd say this is bug fixing.
Although it doesn't fix the underlying cause of the fault it does cover the
specific fault generated a
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom, I understand your research on the historical usage of null, but in
> PostgreSQL we have not two but three possible uses for n-u-l-l:
>
> o null pointer
> o null byte
> o null SQL value
>
> With that list, anything that makes null clearer is great. I
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
> >
> > http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
>
> Are you sure Bruce? I'd say this is bug fixing.
>
> Although it doesn't fix the underlying cause of the fault it d
Hi,
This patch finishes off the work that I did with making view
definitions use pretty printing.
It does:
* Pretty check constraints
* Pretty index predicates
* Pretty rule definitions
* Uppercases PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE to be consistent with CHECK and
FOREIGN KEY
* View rules are improved to m