Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think this is the patch I like. It does the auto-detect handling as I
hoped. I will just do the doc updates to mention it.
My only issue is that this is per-connection, while I think you have to
create a global variable that defaults to false, and on first connect,
check, a
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think this is the patch I like. It does the auto-detect handling as I
hoped. I will just do the doc updates to mention it.
My only issue is that this is per-connection, while I think you have to
create a global variable that defaults to false, and o
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the maili
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is the patch I like.
The #if coding is messy and unnecessary. You could do the test as per
the non-POSIX variant using two calls of pqsignal(), and not have any
system dependence here, nor a need for .
regards, tom
Oh, forgot to mention ...
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only issue is that this is per-connection, while I think you have to
> create a global variable that defaults to false, and on first connect,
> check, and not after.
No, because this patch does not have any global effect on
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think this is the patch I like.
The #if coding is messy and unnecessary. You could do the test as per
the non-POSIX variant using two calls of pqsignal(), and not have any
system dependence here, nor a need for .
What about mu
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about multithreaded apps?
> old = pgsignal(SIPEPIPE, SIG_IGN);
> ** another thread calls sigaction(SIGPIPE,,);
> pgsignal(SIGPIPE, old);
> And the signal state is corrupted.
If other threads are changing the signal state mid-flight, we are
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think we need to complicate pqsignal's API for this. Instead
we'd better document that SIGPIPE handling has to be set up and kept
stable before doing any libpq operations in a multithread app.
Not reliable.
An app could install it's own signal handler and block SIGPIPE
You can send it to me to test. I've duplicated the reported behavior
here so I can test the fix. (Ideally, send me a url to downloaded it
from rather than attaching it.)
Just a thought, a corresponding option of --batch/-B could be added to do
the opposite of the --interactive/-I option. Having
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... But the SIG_IGN/restore
> sequence affects the whole app - PQconnectdb calls would result in
> randomly dropped SIGPIPE signals.
Good point. AFAICS we lose anyway if we don't have sigaction()
available, but hopefully any multithreaded platform ha
I will write the psql.sgml changes.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Mark
Claudio Natoli wrote:
> For src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c and src/include/c.h
> (Note: should ioctlsocket_ret be initialized to 1 for BEOS too, and can it
> take an unsigned parameter? If so, could simplify.)
OK, I have updated this for 7.4 and CVS. Any idea why it has to be
initialized to
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Claudio Natoli wrote:
> > For src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c and src/include/c.h
> > (Note: should ioctlsocket_ret be initialized to 1 for BEOS too, and can it
> > take an unsigned parameter? If so, could simplify.)
>
> OK, I have updated this for 7.4 and CVS. Any idea
Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> If this is acceptable, I'll send a similar one for src/backend/Makefile
>
> Cheers,
> Claudio
>
>
> ---
> WE HAVE MOVED - PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW C
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> If this is acc
> Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
Yes, that's correct. (strictly, at the time of creation, I was working off
the WIN32_DEV branch...)
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
http://www.m
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
> > Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
>
> Yes, that's correct. (strictly, at the time of creation, I was working off
> the WIN32_DEV branch...)
OK. You said you had some backend/Makefile stuff too. Please check CVS
head first because I dealt with ln -s an
Is there a TODO here?
---
Neil Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This does suggest that it might be worth making the struct layout be
> >
> > int NodeTag;
> > int length;
> > foo *head;
> >
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a TODO here?
I've been short on time recently, so I haven't had a chance to make
the suggested changes to the List patch. I'll send in an updated
version of the List changes, and if there aren't any gripes, I'll
begin making the changes to the L
Is this to be applied to CVS HEAD?
---
Rod Taylor wrote:
> A general re-organization of Alter Table. Node wise, it is a
> AlterTableStmt with a list of AlterTableCmds. The Cmds are the
> individual actions to be completed (
Patch applied to HEAD and 7.4CVS. Thanks.
---
Stephan Szabo wrote:
> Here's a patch that adds some text mentioning that
> RESTRICT is not deferrable to the create table reference
> page.
Content-Description:
[ Attachmen
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 7.4CVS. Thanks.
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Here's some improvements. I just ended up referring people to Jason's
> website for install as service, because it's a quite a long and c
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this to be applied to CVS HEAD?
It sounded like large portions were still at the request-for-comment
stage...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze i
24 matches
Mail list logo
