Hans-Jürgen Schönig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have attaches a patch against 7.4.0 which contains the
> implementation of the following todo item.
I sent a proposal for this functionality to -hackers a month or so
ago, and implemented it a couple days later -- it was sent to
pgsql-patches, an
This patch refactors execTuples.c in two ways:
(1) ExecInitXXXResultTupleSlot() used a macro to avoid some
duplicated code, whereas calling ExecInitExtraTupleSlot() would
make the code more clear.
(2) ExecTypeFromTL() and ExecCleanTypeFromTL() duplicated a bunch
heh. Now I can cross that off my todo list :-)
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
I just enable support for internationalization of initdb. I used the same style from "scripts". The files need to be put in initdb directory (nls.mk and po/pt_BR.po). The patch was made under CVS HEAD.
Hi,
I just enable support for internationalization of initdb. I used the same style from
"scripts". The files need to be put in initdb directory (nls.mk and po/pt_BR.po). The
patch was made under CVS HEAD.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler (at) ufgnet.ufg.br
Desenvolvedor Web e Administrador
No objections from interfaces, can this be applied?
Regards, Philip.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: quick ECPG doco change
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:00:34 +1100
From: Philip Yarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, this doco patch is a quick one to add explicit me
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Does 30% difference above count as significant?
No. It's Linux, we can look at the sources: there is no per-fd cache,
the page cache is global. Thus fsync() syncs the whole cache to disk.
A problem could only occur if the file cache is not global - perhaps a
per-nod
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:46:34AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Do we know that having the background writer fsync a file that was
> > > written by a backend cause all the data to fsync? I think I could write
> > > a program to test this by timing each of these tests:
> >
>
On Monday 17 November 2003 11:16, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Do we know that having the background writer fsync a file that was
> > > written by a backend cause all the data to fsync? I think I could
> > > write a program to test this by timing each of these tests:
> >
> > That m
I have attaches a patch against 7.4.0 which contains the implementation
of the following todo item.
> Log message:
>Add:
>
>> * Add GUC setting to make created tables
> default to WITHOUT OIDS
Cheers,
Hans
--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Ludo-Hartmannplatz 1/14, A-116
