Claudio Natoli wrote:
main file. WIth Claudio's fix, this isn't necessary.
Bruce, are you sure this is true? The fix is only for files than are
open()'d, not fopen()'d (as per AllocateFile).
If your fix works, I will change the Win32-specific code to use open()
and fdopen(). The only
Dear patchers,
As I see that my previous attempt has met a lot of reactions;-)
Please find attached my SECOND patch proposition which sets an initial
hint infrastructure into the sql parser. At the time it is pretty simple
as I'm not yet convinced yet that I'll need a hint stack or something
If your fix works, I will change the Win32-specific code to use open()
and fdopen(). The only advantage to the old code was that it would
release locks, then go into a rename loop, which is horid, and we need
to avoid the loop.
Ah, I see. Should've been obvious you had that in mind
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see we still are dumping CREATE TABLE using WITH OIDS, rather than
using the more portable SET default_with_oids. This needs fixing.
Yes, I know. If you're eager for it, please consider implementing it
yourself.
-Neil
---(end
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where are we on this? It seems like a win to me.
I thought it was a bad idea, although I no longer remember the details.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I remember correctly, you didn't like the index routines reading the
tuple information, or something like that, but there was a performance
benefit for duplicate keys, so I think we should re-investigate this.
I don't see the actual patch either in
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I remember correctly, you didn't like the index routines reading the
tuple information, or something like that, but there was a performance
benefit for duplicate keys, so I think we should re-investigate this.
I don't see the
