On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > Yes, his patch ended up adding this to THREAD_LIBS, but
> > > template/unixware has:
> > >
> > > For gcc:
> > >
> > > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-pthread"
> > >
> > > and for non-gcc:
> > >
> > > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-K pthread"
> > >
>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It seems that what we have to do for Unixware is add
> > >> -Kpthread to LDFLAGS; is that correct?
> >
> > > Unusually, this platform doesn't have a THREAD_LIBS se
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Yes, his patch ended up adding this to THREAD_LIBS, but
> > template/unixware has:
> >
> > For gcc:
> >
> > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-pthread"
> >
> > and for non-gcc:
> >
> > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-K pthread"
> >
> > Larry, are these wrong?
> Nope, those work, and should be pass
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It seems that what we have to do for Unixware is add
> >> -Kpthread to LDFLAGS; is that correct?
>
> > Unusually, this platform doesn't have a THREAD_LIBS setting, only
> > THREAD_CPPFLAGS. so I have to use that.
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems that what we have to do for Unixware is add
>> -Kpthread to LDFLAGS; is that correct?
> Unusually, this platform doesn't have a THREAD_LIBS setting, only
> THREAD_CPPFLAGS. so I have to use that.
If Larry quoted the Compiler
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with
> > > threads; it's not a property of an individual library.
> >
> > > SO, IF we are using the threads flags, we need to use them on AL
Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with
> > threads; it's not a property of an individual library.
>
> > SO, IF we are using the threads flags, we need to use them on ALL=20
> > libpq-using programs, ou
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with
> threads; it's not a property of an individual library.
> SO, IF we are using the threads flags, we need to use them on ALL=20
> libpq-using programs, ours or the users.
Yeek. Thi
Robert Treat wrote:
> I think I can work that up. Out of curiosity are the plain text files
> generated from the html files? Also I noticed that not all plain text
> FAQ's have html FAQ's associated with them... is that by design or just
> the fact that no one has bothered to bring them up to spe
I think I can work that up. Out of curiosity are the plain text files
generated from the html files? Also I noticed that not all plain text
FAQ's have html FAQ's associated with them... is that by design or just
the fact that no one has bothered to bring them up to speed?
Robert Treat
On Fri,
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > I'll ask the compiler guys, but I suspect we're going to have to do it
> > this way.
> >
> From the Compiler Guys:
>
> The a.out (not any library) should be linked with -Kpthread (not
> -lpthread).
> This will force libthread to be linked in the right order relative to
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 09:18:03 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 10:15:56 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[moved to -patches because of the patch]
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 08:01:53 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> [moved to -patches because of the patch]
>
>
> --On Friday, March 19, 2004 08:01:53 -0500 Bruce Momjian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >> > I thought that once you include libpthread in libpq, that you don't
> >> > have to mention it again then you use libpq. Is y
Dear Tom,
> Attached is a proposed patch that fixes the
> cursor-position-in-CREATE-FUNCTION issue per my earlier suggestion.
>
> The re-parsing of the original command is simplistic but will handle all
> normal cases.
> [...]
That's quite a demonstration;-)
However, I still stick with my "bad"
[moved to -patches because of the patch]
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 08:01:53 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I thought that once you include libpthread in libpq, that you don't
> have to mention it again then you use libpq. Is your platform
> different so
15 matches
Mail list logo