Re: [PATCHES] Digital Mars C++ - Clients

2004-07-09 Thread Tom Lane
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure this is necessarily the right way to approach the patch in > the first place. It might be better to make a port file with a > popen/pclose implementation (even if it simply acts as a failed open and > does nothing on close). This gets into m

Re: [PATCHES] Oracle compatibility ...

2004-07-09 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ patch to support MINUS as a synonym for EXCEPT ] I can't agree with doing this. MINUS is not a reserved word according to SQL99, so supporting Oracle's syntax reduces our spec compatibility by a visible amount. And for what

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PgSQL 7.4.2 - NaN on Tru64 UNIX

2004-07-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, I will use "DBL_QNAN" for the patch. Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. ---

Re: [PATCHES] build infrastructure for extensions v3

2004-07-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Wow, that is a big patch. Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Fabien COELHO

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] PgSQL 7.4.2 - NaN on Tru64 UNIX

2004-07-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Nikola Milutinovic wrote: > Hi guys. > >

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] s_lock support for win32

2004-07-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Manfred Spraul wrote: > >> But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for > >> corruptions. > > > Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon. > > Has this been agreed to by the win32

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] s_lock support for win32

2004-07-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Manfred Spraul wrote: >> But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for >> corruptions. > Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon. Has this been agreed to by the win32-hackers list? My recollection

Re: [PATCHES] Digital Mars C++ - Clients

2004-07-09 Thread Walter
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Other products, such as wxWindows, have seen quite a lot of Digital Mars > > users embrace it once it started supporting DMC++. > > That is an extremely poor allegory. wxWindows is a GUI TOOLKIT. > PostgreSQ

[PATCHES] fix schema ownership on first connection preliminary patch v2

2004-07-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added the v2 version of this patch to the patch queue (attached). I agree with Tom that there is no need for regression tests for this feature and have removed that part of the patch. http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

Re: [PATCHES] PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR

2004-07-09 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 12:53, Klaus Naumann wrote: > archive_program is provided with a string which contains the target directory. > That doesn't really make sense. archive_dest is used for both archive and restore, thats why its set as a separate parameter. Thats the rationale...lets see what o