[PATCHES] 8.0.0b1: configure.in cygipc

2004-08-26 Thread Reini Urban
Attached is a cygipc patch against 8.0.0p1 and 7.4.5: The cygipc patch should also be applied to the 7.4.x branch (if there will be some more releases): cygipc is deprecated in cygwin, replaced by cygserver added test to check for running cygserver and the required server in $CYGWIN. Otherw

Re: [PATCHES] 8.0.0b1: configure.in cygipc

2004-08-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Reini Urban wrote: >cygipc is deprecated in cygwin, replaced by cygserver >added test to check for running cygserver and the required >server in $CYGWIN. Otherwise build for cygipc, but print a > warning. configure checks the build environment, not the run time environment. It's comp

Re: [PATCHES] 8.0.0b1: configure.in cygipc

2004-08-26 Thread Reini Urban
Peter Eisentraut schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: cygipc is deprecated in cygwin, replaced by cygserver added test to check for running cygserver and the required server in $CYGWIN. Otherwise build for cygipc, but print a warning. configure checks the build environment, not the run time environmen

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 August 2004 14:59 > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid > > Ok, if you say so :-) I had the general impression we wanted > that. But then

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Service startup delay

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 August 2004 02:44 > To: Max Dunn > Cc: Dave Page; 'Barry Lind'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Service startup delay > > > Another issue is that when installing the Postgres service

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Should we (if only for the sake of completeness) make the converse one-byte change in port/win32/signal.c? It says: void pg_queue_signal(int signum) { if (signum >= PG_SIGNAL_COUNT || signum < 0) return; ... ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0. cheers andrew Dave Page w

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 August 2004 15:43 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Magnus Hagander; Tom Lane; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid > > > Should we (if only for the s

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
Shouldn't be necessary. We can do it, but it makes no real difference :-) It just ends up queued, but since there is no signal #0, it will never get dispatched. But it certainly wouldn't break things to do it either :-) //Magnus > Should we (if only for the sake of completeness) make the > con

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0. > That was my original intention, however Magnus thought it best just to > let it be queued and subsequently ignored by the backend - thinking > about it 15 minutes later I can't for the life of me thi

[PATCHES] Backported the very useful oracle_compat.c from postgres 8.0 beta to 7.4.5

2004-08-26 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Dear all! I'm new to the list, so please excuse if I repost this patch. In the found the _very_ useful oracle_compat.c function which implements correct UPPER(), LOWER() and INITCAP() for multibyte charactersets. This change is very important for everyone who uses multilingual databases, because

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 August 2004 16:24 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Magnus Hagander; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid > > "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] pg_hba.conf and IP-MASK

2004-08-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, doc patch attached and applied that prefers CIDR format for pg_hba.conf. --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Tom Lane said: > > "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Since our defaults don't use old-style masks any m

[PATCHES] Contrib Shared varaibles

2004-08-26 Thread pgsql
After taking some suggestions, I added a number of routines. Please test and tell me what you think. (Yes, I know the API is poorly named, have any suggestions?) sharedvar-040826.tgz Description: application/unix-tar ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP