Tom Lane wrote:
It seemed a tad excessive to me, at least for routine regression
testing. What do you think of making it a separate test script and
adding it to "make bigcheck", as we did once with the numeric_big tests?
I'm not sure I see the point: I would guess that the rate at which we're
exp
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >
> >>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>>How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what is in
> >>>port.h?
> >>
> >>What is the need of *any* special file handling functions for client tools?
> >
> >
> > We could av
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what is in
port.h?
What is the need of *any* special file handling functions for client tools?
We could avoid it but it does give us Unix semantics so it seemed good
to keep it if
The attached patch implements my proposal of 6-Sep to force updating of
the snapshot before every SQL query executed by SQL and SPI functions,
but to provide an "escape hatch" by defining a read-only mode in which
we do neither SetQuerySnapshot nor CommandCounterIncrement, and instead
always use th
Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Thus it suggests that the only use for the two targets is whether someone
> is interested in having a smaller footprint version...
>
> The other reason why I sticked to it in the submission is to be upward
> compatible with the previous state with 2 differents targets. I fee
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what is in
> > port.h?
>
> What is the need of *any* special file handling functions for client tools?
We could avoid it but it does give us Unix semantics so it seemed good
to keep it if we co
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Where are we on this?
> >
> > I think we're waiting on Peter to review it.
>
> I have no technical issue with the patch, except that as I have
> previously mentioned, I don't particularly care for what i
Tom Lane wrote:
> Nonetheless, it would also be good to have some consistency between
> the core PG server and related projects. I tend to agree that we
> should honor pgadmin's precedent here; it's not a strong argument but
> the argument for fa over fa_IR seems even weaker.
"fa_IR" would useles
The following patch fixes pltcl compiles on win32. The code change in
pltcl.c is from this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=tcl_createslave+error&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF
-8&c2coff=1&safe=off&selm=20040107132138.57308.qmail%40web60304.mail.yah
oo.com&rnum=3
Can't say I fully understand why, but it
Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I see that there is a farsi translation in pgadmin and you named it fa_IR.
> This isn't comparable. In pgadmin, we're bound to the canonical names
> defined in wxWidgets, which is fa_IR (and there's no other Farsi
> version)
Bruce Momjian wrote:
How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what is in
port.h?
What is the need of *any* special file handling functions for client tools?
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe comm
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Where are we on this?
>
> I think we're waiting on Peter to review it.
I have no technical issue with the patch, except that as I have
previously mentioned, I don't particularly care for what it does.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
we are starting a new language translation in postgresql.
I send the pg_controldata message translation in Farsi language.
I sended it to the "Peter Eisentraut" with the name fa_IR.po. He said that
"Is there any use of "fa" outside of "IR"? Else I would just call th
How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what is in
port.h?
extern int pgrename(const char *from, const char *to);
extern int pgunlink(const char *path);
Good question on wether we need to keep this working but it would be
nice to keep it I guess for client-only
hello,
we are starting a new language translation in postgresql.
I send the pg_controldata message translation in Farsi language.
I sended it to the "Peter Eisentraut" with the name fa_IR.po. He said that
"Is there any use of "fa" outside of "IR"? Else I would just call the
translation files "fa.p
Well, we don't have forever to wait on this, and I don't plan to require
patches to be held until one specific person can review them. Fabien,
which version is your best? I will put it in the patch queue.
---
Fabien COELHO
16 matches
Mail list logo
