On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 17:33, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> After seeing the "Welcome to psql 8.0.0beta3, the PostgreSQL
> interactive terminal." message, I finally got irritated enough at it to
> try and figure out how to silence it without using the -q option to
> psql(1).
I think the second hunk (
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 02:04, Neil Conway wrote:
> This patch cleans up the licensing terms on some imported BSD-licensed
> files in the source tree
Patch applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the u
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 15:23, Neil Conway wrote:
> This one-line patches merges a micro-opt from upstream (OpenBSD)
> sources: we can make a read-only local array "static" and reduce the
> size of the generated object file slightly.
Patch applied.
-Neil
---(end of broa
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 00:11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In my opinion, this is a completely pointless exercise in replacing
> perfectly good code with code that we didn't know until today. Not
> during beta please.
Well, I think the chance of there being a bug in NetBSD's strtol/strtoul
(that do
I suggest to alter the
pg_restore --help output from
-
Usage:
pg_restore [OPTION]... [FILE]
General options:
-d, --dbname=NAMEoutput database name
-f, --file=FILENAME output file name
---
to:
--
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
Attached is a patch that replaces src/port/{strtol.c,strtoul.c} with
versions derived from current NetBSD CVS sources, which has a
3-clause BSD license.
In my opinion, this is a completely pointless exercise in replacing
perfectly good
> >> Tom's recent patch to improve stale lockfile detection included a
> >> call to getppid() which doesn't exist on Windows.
> >> There is no clean way to implement one (previously discussed on
> >> hackers-win32) hence the attach patch simply #ifdefs out the call.
>
> Done. I think this is no
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom's recent patch to improve stale lockfile detection
>> included a call to getppid() which doesn't exist on Windows.
>> There is no clean way to implement one (previously discussed
>> on hackers-win32) hence the attach patch simply #ifdefs out the call.
Neil Conway wrote:
> Attached is a patch that replaces src/port/{strtol.c,strtoul.c} with
> versions derived from current NetBSD CVS sources, which has a
> 3-clause BSD license.
In my opinion, this is a completely pointless exercise in replacing
perfectly good code with code that we didn't know u
Ugh. *sigh*
I wondered idly if we might be able to make a safe assumption about the
staleness of the lockfile based on (possibly not very portably)
comparing its mtime with the system boot time.
cheers
andrew
Dave Page wrote:
More haste, less speed...
Patch attached this time!
/D
-Origina
The attached applied patch makes libpgport be front-end only and adds
libpgport_srv be a backend library that uses palloc, ereport, etc. This
simplifies the makefiles for client applications.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
More haste, less speed...
Patch attached this time!
/D
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Page
> Sent: 04 October 2004 14:41
> To: PostgreSQL-patches
> Subject: Win32 fix for miscinit.c
>
> Tom's recent patch to improve stale lockfile detection
> included a call to getppid() which does
Tom's recent patch to improve stale lockfile detection included a call
to getppid() which doesn't exist on Windows. There is no clean way to
implement one (previously discussed on hackers-win32) hence the attach
patch simply #ifdefs out the call.
Please apply ASAP as the win32 build is currently b
Attached hack fixes building under cygwin.
The real analysis is in my "LDFLAGS overriding" thread, but if you live
with that, this is the only remaining patch for cygwin to compile.
Everything else seems to be solved.
Even python and perl, now that tcl is removed.
Basic plperl regression tests (
Tom Lane schrieb:
Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter Eisentraut schrieb:
Please point out where that happens so it can be corrected.
Something like this (against an older cvs snap), but I don't believe
that this is the best way to solve it. It just solved building under cygwin.
Peter a
> There is no requirement that the program's output mention the
> license terms (perhaps you are thinking of the GPL?)
Yea,. I must have been... :)
... John
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http:/
John Hansen wrote:
Won't that violate the BSD licence?
No; if it did, psql's "-q" option would already violate the license. The
BSD license merely says:
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written
agreem
John Hansen wrote:
> Won't that violate the BSD licence?
The start-up message doesn't even contain any copyright information, so
no.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ig
>
> After seeing the "Welcome to psql 8.0.0beta3, the PostgreSQL
> interactive terminal." message, I finally got irritated
> enough at it to try and figure out how to silence it without
> using the -q option to psql(1). The attached (trivial) patch
> fixes said problem so that one can add "\s
Tom Lane wrote:
I think it is a real bad idea to unilaterally change the copyright text
in files we got from somewhere else, no matter how benign our intentions.
Agreed.
Instead, how about adopting the NetBSD version of the functionality?
If the files did indeed come from UCB originally, then NetBS
After seeing the "Welcome to psql 8.0.0beta3, the PostgreSQL
interactive terminal." message, I finally got irritated enough at it to
try and figure out how to silence it without using the -q option to
psql(1). The attached (trivial) patch fixes said problem so that one
can add "\set QUIET" to
21 matches
Mail list logo
