Re: [PATCHES] Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)

2005-03-03 Thread Tom Lane
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am using anoncvs from yesterday, so if Tom's new scheme is > *very* new I may be missing it. It's not committed yet ;-) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you

Re: [PATCHES] Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)

2005-03-03 Thread Neil Conway
Mark Kirkwood wrote: If so, it looks like I need to do some stuff with ResourceOwners, otherwise ReleaseBuffer will fail (or am I wandering up the wrong track here?). I am using anoncvs from yesterday, so if Tom's new scheme is *very* new I may be missing it. It's so new, in fact, it's not in CVS y

Re: [PATCHES] Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)

2005-03-03 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Neil Conway wrote: I don't like accessing shared data structures without acquiring the appropriate locks; even if it doesn't break anything, it seems like just asking for trouble. In order to be able to inspect a buffer's tag in Tom's new locking scheme (not yet in HEAD, but will be in 8.1), you

Re: [PATCHES] Faster install-sh in C

2005-03-03 Thread Neil Conway
Alvaro Herrera wrote: I wrote an "install" program in C. It's supposed to replace the config/install-sh script, limited to the functionality we need, i.e. what is in Makefiles in the Pg main source tree. The main objective of this exercise is to reduce "make install" execution time; a part of tha

Re: [PATCHES] [INTERFACES] bcc32.mak for libpq broken? (distro 8.0.0) (fwd)

2005-03-03 Thread Berényi Gábor
The problem is something else. Gives the same message. Bruce Momjian írta: > Berényi Gábor wrote: > > Dear Bruce, > > Didn't work: > > Fatal bcc32.mak 169: No terminator specified for in-line file operator > > Look forward to hear of you again, Gabor > > OK, new bcc32.mak attached. It turns o

Re: [PATCHES] is it a bug ?

2005-03-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Zouari Fourat wrote: > excuse me but i dont understand what should i do ? The locale you specified when you ran initdb needs to match the encoding of the database. The equivalent pairs are usually named like this: Locale Encoding de_DELATIN1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] LATIN9 de_DE.utf8

Re: [PATCHES] is it a bug ?

2005-03-03 Thread Zouari Fourat
excuse me but i dont understand what should i do ? On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:28:50 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > [ been expecting someone who knows more than me to step forward, but > > ... ] What I think is happening here is that PG is expecting the > > tr

Re: [PATCHES] is it a bug ?

2005-03-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > [ been expecting someone who knows more than me to step forward, but > ... ] What I think is happening here is that PG is expecting the > translated messages in your .po files to have the same encoding as > your database encoding, but they aren't. Can you convert the .po > files

Re: [PATCHES] is it a bug ?

2005-03-03 Thread Tom Lane
Zouari Fourat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > here's what logs contain : > ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconvertibles 0xc389 > ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconvertibles 0xf474e9 > ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconvertibles 0xf474e9 > ATTENT

Re: [PATCHES] is it a bug ?

2005-03-03 Thread Zouari Fourat
here's what logs contain : ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconvertibles 0xc389 ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconvertibles 0xf474e9 ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconvertibles 0xf474e9 ATTENTION: Laisse de côté les caractères UTF-8 inconverti

[PATCHES] is it a bug ?

2005-03-03 Thread Zouari Fourat
Hello, When selecting (from php) using this select : SELECT msgid,content,timecreated,soa FROM sms_mo WHERE (LOWER(content) LIKE 'club%') AND (da='87000') AND (timecreated > '2005-02-18 17:00:00') ORDER BY msgid ASC I get this error : PANIQUE: ERRORDATA_STACK_SIZE exceeded server closed the conne