[PATCHES] default to WITHOUT OIDS

2005-03-10 Thread Neil Conway
This patch makes default_with_oids disabled by default, per earlier discussion, and updates the documentation accordingly. I might have missed a few spots in the documentation that implicitly assume that OIDs are present in user tables by default, but I think I got most of them. Barring any obj

Re: [PATCHES] trivial refactoring of WaitOnLock

2005-03-10 Thread Neil Conway
Neil Conway wrote: memcpy(new_status, old_status, len) would be faster yet. Which is what I originally implemented, and then decided the sprintf() was clearer (since performance isn't very important here). On reflection, memcpy() + strcpy() should be fine; I'll commit this tomorrow. Applied. -Ne

Re: [PATCHES] Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)

2005-03-10 Thread Neil Conway
Mark Kirkwood wrote: A couple of minor amendments here [...] Barring any objections, I'll apply this tomorrow. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL

Re: [PATCHES] Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)

2005-03-10 Thread Mark Kirkwood
A couple of minor amendments here: - remove link to libpq (from cut+past of dblnk's Makefile) - add comment for pg_buffercache module in contrib/README - change my listed email to this one (I have resigned) regards Mark diff -Nacr pgsql.orig/contrib/Makefile pgsql/contrib/Makefile *** pgsql.ori

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c

2005-03-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Would you please check current CVS? I think I addressed most of these issues already. --- Nicolai Tufar wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:53:08PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Applied. > > Thanks a lot. The patch

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests

2005-03-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> First line of thought: we surely must not insert a snprintf into > >> libpq.so unless it is 100% up to spec *and* has no performance issues > >> ... neither of which can be claimed of the CVS-tip version. > > > Agreed, and we have t

Re: [PATCHES] fork() refactoring

2005-03-10 Thread Neil Conway
Neil Conway wrote: I'll apply this patch to HEAD later today, barring any objections. Applied. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]