Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> xlog.c is a fairly random place to put that functionality. Didn't it
> >> strike any warning bells for you when you had to add so many new
> >> #includes? I'm not entirely sure where this
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Th
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> I thought your version was even more so :-(. I've applied the attached
> patch instead.
>
That's too bad :-( but the happy part is that it is fixed now.
Regards,
Qingqing
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8:
Please apply the following patch to correct a small mistake in a
translation file.
cvs diff: Diffing src/bin/psql/po
Index: src/bin/psql/po/es.po
===
RCS file: /home/alvherre/cvs/pgsql/src/bin/psql/po/es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.7
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> These are the only two files in /executor that have old QUEL comments in
>> to describe their behaviour, AFAICS.
> Applied with some minor cleanups. Thanks for the patch.
I restored the one example Simon removed, as I think it's a us
Simon Riggs wrote:
These are the only two files in /executor that have old QUEL comments in
to describe their behaviour, AFAICS.
Applied with some minor cleanups. Thanks for the patch.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list a