Tom Lane wrote:
I think it would be shorter and clearer to write
remoteConn *remconn = NULL;
...
remconn = rconn;
...
remconn->newXactForCursor = TRUE;
Also, you might be able to combine this variable with the existing
rconn local variable and thus simpl
Tom Lane wrote:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is a small typo in guc.c.
>
> The *real* problem with that variable description is that it's about a
> factor of 5 too long. Will we be copying the entire contents of
> config.sgml next?
It is the same length as zer
Applied. Thanks.
---
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a small typo in guc.c.
>
>
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira
> euler[at]yahoo_com_br
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a small typo in guc.c.
The *real* problem with that variable description is that it's about a
factor of 5 too long. Will we be copying the entire contents of
config.sgml next?
regards, tom lane
-
Hi,
This is a small typo in guc.c.
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler[at]yahoo_com_br
___
Promoção Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: a cada hora navegada você acumula cupons e
concorre a mais de 500 prêmios! Participe
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is my counter-proposal to Bruce's dblink patch. Any comments?
Minor coding suggestion: to me it seems messy to do
> + int*openCursorCount = NULL;
> + bool *newXactForCursor = NULL;
> ! openCursorCount = &pconn->openC
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 22:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have written the attached patch which I think does what you suggested.
> > I found all the places where we disallowed 24:00:00, and make it valid,
> > including nabstime.c.
>
> Should this be added to the regression
