On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 18:00 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> Anyway, if there was a reasonably cheap way to present the query strings
> of protocol-level and SQL prepared statements in the same manner, I
> think we should definitely do so. Since there doesn't appear to be one,
> I'm content to just u
A few minor stylistic gripes...
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 20:27 +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> *** 150,155
> --- 151,171
> do {completion_charp = Query_for_list_of_attributes;
> completion_info_charp = table; matches = completion_matches(text,
> complete_from_query); } while(0)
>
> /
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running
DOH! It would be good if doc/src had a better mechanism for handling
code; one that would allow for writing the cod
On 1/7/06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marko Kreen wrote:
> > The above table seem bit messy, but I see it as much easier to explain
> > to somebody.
>
> I am confused about your list above, so I can't see how that would be
> easy to explain.
Easy as in "use GRANT USAGE, forget about rest". You are c
