On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 15:56 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> The attached patch deletes a few places that attempted to define
> INT_MAX, SCHAR_MAX, and the like if they were not previously defined.
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have y
The attached patch deletes a few places that attempted to define
INT_MAX, SCHAR_MAX, and the like if they were not previously defined.
All these constants must be defined by limits.h according to C89, so I
think we can safely assume they are provided.
I'll apply this later today, barring any objec
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:54 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> This patch implements some new aggregate functions defined by SQL2003:
> stddev_pop(), stddev_samp(), var_pop(), and var_samp().
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searc
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:53 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, we cannot reuse a dead tuple. Maybe we can reuse the space of a dead
> > tuple by reducing the tuple to it's header info.
>
> Attached patch realizes the concept of his i
"Dave Page" writes:
> <> The attached patch fixes the xml2 contrib module for
> windows, by changing the order of -lxslt & -lxml2 (yes, after 2 releases
> that's all it took!). Tested on Windows & Linux.
Doh!
> It might be worth manually testing this on any other platforms that
> might be sensi
<> The attached patch fixes the xml2 contrib module for
windows, by changing the order of -lxslt & -lxml2 (yes, after 2 releases
that's all it took!). Tested on Windows & Linux.
It might be worth manually testing this on any other platforms that
might be sensitive to the library order - this modu
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've applied the attached modified version of your patch. In this
> coding, absorbs are done after every 1000 buffer writes in BufferSync
> and after every 10 fsyncs in mdsync. We may need to twiddle these
> numbers but it seems at least in the right ballpa
