Re: [PATCHES] Building with Visual C++

2006-05-01 Thread Hiroshi Saito
From: "Magnus Hagander" I am sorry in a very late reaction... >>> We'll need a VC buildfarm member in place to catch us anytime we >>> change the Makefiles in a way that the script doesn't understand. >> >> Not a problem - Snake has VC++ 6, 2003 and 2005 installed. This is a trial in the

Re: [PATCHES] Improvement of search for a binary operator

2006-05-01 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > The solution I'm considering is to add an additional namespace.c routine > defined like > Oid OpnameGetOprid(List *opname, Oid oprleft, Oid oprright) I coded this up, and it seems to be a win just on code cleanliness grounds, because there are several places that want to do a sear

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:28:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> Since both vacuum and autovacuum will be cutting stats records, do >>> we want to just have the autovacuum >>> stats record have the fact that it was autovacuum that did the >>> vacuum

Re: [PATCHES] Improvement of search for a binary operator

2006-05-01 Thread Tom Lane
Atsushi Ogawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that we can search the system catalog cache instead of > retrieval from the candidates of operator in the binary_oper_exact, > and reverse the order of executing (1) and (2) for performance > improvement. I've been thinking more about how this mi

Re: [PATCHES] pgstat: remove delayed destroy / pipe:

2006-05-01 Thread Peter Brant
It turns out the problem is that port/pipe.c is compiled with -DFRONTEND and include/port/win32.h wraps the recv to pgwin32_recv macro in a #ifndef FRONTEND. We've actually been using the WinSock recv function directly (verified with gcc -E). If somebody else could take over actually fixing this,