This patch is for the following TODO item.
SQL command:
-/Change LIMIT/OFFSET and FETCH/MOVE to use int8
/Since the limit/offset patch is already applied,
this patch is meant for Fetch/Move query.
I have tested the patch and it works for int64 values.
Please verify this.
Thanks
Dhanaraj
/
/
I wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello,
I send two small patches. First does conversion from perl to
postgresql array in OUT parameters. Second patch allow hash form
output from procedures with one OUT argument.
I will try to review these in the next 2 weeks unless someone beats me
to
Based on this analysis, and problems with differing regression results
on different platforms, this attached patch has been reverted.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello,
I send two
Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The latest HEAD is segfaulting on startup if I have the following
lines in postgresql.conf:
custom_variable_classes = 'plperl'
plperl.use_strict = on
Bruce, please re-revert that GUC patch and don't put it back in until
someone
Dhanaraj M wrote:
I had a quick look:
***
*** 209,215
/* Return command status if wanted */
if (completionTag)
! snprintf(completionTag, COMPLETION_TAG_BUFSIZE, %s %ld,
stmt-ismove ? MOVE : FETCH,
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think this is the right approach. Maybe it would be reasonable
to add another arm to the %union instead, not sure. The problem is the
amount of ugly casts you have to use below. The scanner code seems to
think that a constant larger than the
Hi,
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
Based on this patch and comments, I have applied a patch that sets the
buffer to 32k, and adds the URL in a comment.
Is it backported to
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think this is the right approach. Maybe it would be reasonable
to add another arm to the %union instead, not sure. The problem is the
amount of ugly casts you have to use below. The scanner code seems to
think that a
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not sure that I see the point of this at all. ISTM the entire
reason for using a cursor is that you're going to fetch the results
in bite-size pieces. I don't see the current Postgres source code
surviving into the era where 2G
Bruce,
Attached patch has been cleaned up,
and modified to be able to work with CVS HEAD.
Thanks.
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
Alvaro,
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Huh, I bet it works with 8.1.4, but it doesn't work on CVS HEAD:
/pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c: In function
Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
Hi,
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
Based on this patch and comments, I have applied a patch that sets the
buffer to 32k, and adds the URL in a
This issue is closed, right?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something Hannu wrote has just reminded me that
pg_current_xlog_location() returns the current Insert pointer rather
than the
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This issue is closed, right?
We've agreed we need two functions, but it's not done yet. Seems pretty
trivial though ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This issue is closed, right?
We've agreed we need two functions, but it's not done yet. Seems pretty
trivial though ...
OK, that's what I was unclear about.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
Bruce,
Attached patch has been cleaned up,
and modified to be able to work with CVS HEAD.
I was thinking, isn't it a lot cleaner to define the functions to use
OUT parameters instead of having to define a custom type for each?
Also, in 8.2 there is a uninstall SQL
15 matches
Mail list logo
