Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The part of this that would actually be useful to put in core is
>> maintaining a 64-bit XID counter, ie, keep an additional counter that
>> bumps every time XID wraps around. This cannot be done very well from
>> outside core but it w
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sounds a pretty obvious move. This would be it then. Please note the
> changes to the ObjectAddresses stuff, mainly to not move the definition
> of struct ObjectAddresses to dependency.h but instead move only the
> typedef.
Looks pretty reasonable, ex
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ok, this patch implements more or less this idea; except that instead of
> > checking the list of implicit dependencies for later objects, we iterate
> > twice on the list of objects to delete, and create a list of implicit
> > depend
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, this patch implements more or less this idea; except that instead of
> checking the list of implicit dependencies for later objects, we iterate
> twice on the list of objects to delete, and create a list of implicit
> dependencies on all of them the
