On 8/7/06, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updated patch attached. It prints the text bind parameters on a single
detail line. I still have not seen portal names generated by libpq.
I'm currently testing CVS tip to generate sample log files. I noticed
that Bruce only patched
On 8/25/06, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, we did not get enough feedback to include this in 8.2. Please
add it to pgfoundry and let's see how it goes.
Yep... it's too bad. A new feature no other database has now goes to
it's final resting place on pgfoundry.
--
Jonah H.
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 8/25/06, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, we did not get enough feedback to include this in 8.2. Please
add it to pgfoundry and let's see how it goes.
Yep... it's too bad. A new feature no other database has now goes to
it's final resting place on
this is inaccurate, irresponsible and insulting to those of us who spend
time maintaining pgfoundry. It is not a graveyard. Plenty of stuff
outside the core gets included in packaged distributions - just see for
example what goes into the Windows distro, or the packages that CP
distributes.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alvaro Herrera
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25.08.2006 00:50:59
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views
Minor suggestion: change get_view_qualification_function to look the
function by Oid rather than name. I wasn't sure it was actually a
Bruce Momjian írta:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
Thanks. Would you please add this instead?
psql
On 8/26/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is inaccurate, irresponsible and insulting to those of us who spend
time maintaining pgfoundry.
Andrew,
I'm sorry if it sounded that way... it wasn't meant as such.
It is not a graveyard. Plenty of stuff outside the core gets included
On 8/26/06, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your attitude has been lacking about this whole thing, as has a lot of
other people. PgFoundry is the official sub project site for PostgreSQL.
That may be the case. However, all I've seen+heard is conjecture that
pgfoundry is a good thing;
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 8/26/06, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your attitude has been lacking about this whole thing, as has a lot of
other people. PgFoundry is the official sub project site for PostgreSQL.
That may be the case. However, all I've seen+heard is conjecture that
On 8/26/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, yes, it is used, and by far more that just hard core hackers.
OK. Kewl. I just hadn't run into many people (except hackers) that
knew about it. Thanks for sharing that.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
10 matches
Mail list logo
