On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I'm assuming checkpoints are triggered by timeout in normal use -- and
it's my recommended configuration whether the patch is installed or not.
I'm curious what other people running fairly serious hardware do in this
area for write-heavy loads, whe
Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is the latest version of Load distributed checkpoint patch.
>
> Couple of questions for you:
>
> -Is it still possible to get the original behavior by adjusting your
> tunables? It would be nice to do a before/after without having to
> recompile
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well I think this would be the same infrastructure we would need to do
>> the other discussed improvement to address pg_dump's impact. That
>> would require us to publish the youngest xmax of the live
>> snapshot
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well I think this would be the same infrastructure we would need to do
> the other discussed improvement to address pg_dump's impact. That
> would require us to publish the youngest xmax of the live
> snapshots. Vacuum could deduce that that xid cannot po
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Here is the latest version of Load distributed checkpoint patch.
Couple of questions for you:
-Is it still possible to get the original behavior by adjusting your
tunables? It would be nice to do a before/after without having to
recompile, and I
