Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to be sure: a backwards-started scan is currently unreachable code,
> correct?
[ yawn... ] I think so, but I wouldn't swear to it right at the moment.
In any case it doesn't seem like a path that we need to optimize.
regards,
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 22:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I fixed a little off-by-one in "backward scan, not inited" branch, but I
> > was unable to test it. It seems that code is actually never used because
> > that case is optimized to a rewind in t
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fixed a little off-by-one in "backward scan, not inited" branch, but I
> was unable to test it. It seems that code is actually never used because
> that case is optimized to a rewind in the executor. I marked those
> seemingly unreachable places
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Tom Lane wrote:
> >>Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>But this is misleading (started postmaster with good value, then edited
> >>>postgresql.conf and entered "-2"):
> >>>17903 LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But this is misleading (started postmaster with good value, then edited
postgresql.conf and entered "-2"):
17903 LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
17903 LOG: -2 is outside the valid range for pa
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But this is misleading (started postmaster with good value, then edited
> > postgresql.conf and entered "-2"):
>
> > 17903 LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
> > 17903 LOG: -2 is outside the valid range for paramet
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But this is misleading (started postmaster with good value, then edited
> postgresql.conf and entered "-2"):
> 17903 LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
> 17903 LOG: -2 is outside the valid range for parameter
> "autovacuum_vacuum_cos
Galy Lee wrote:
Hi,
I'll deal with each issue separately.
> * Bug-1: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit
>
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit should be the following value:
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1, or [1, 1]
> (0 should be prohibited. )
>
> But 0 can also be accepted
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you like to add corresponding Japanese documentation to
> pageinspect, or is it not worthwhile?
No, I think such *deep* users who want to use pageinspect
would be satisfied with English documentation :)
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Ope
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:41:24AM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> The functions bt_metap, bt_page_stats and bt_page_items had moved
> from contrib/pgstattuple to pageinspect. We've already fixed English
> documentation, but Japanese version does not catch up. The attached
> patch just removes tho
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
The functions bt_metap, bt_page_stats and bt_page_items had moved
from contrib/pgstattuple to pageinspect. We've already fixed English
documentation, but Japanese version does not catch up. The attached
patch just removes those descriptions from README.ja in pgstattuple.
11 matches
Mail list logo
