"Chad Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/5/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If we're trying to defend against premature EOF, this hardly seems like
>> a sufficient patch.
> I agree, but it is better than nothing. If you have some suggestions or
> other areas of the pg_restore co
On 8/5/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Chad Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This patch modifies the ReadStr function in pg_backup_archiver.c to
> validate
> > the result of *AH->ReadBufPtr matches the value of l.
>
> If we're trying to defend against premature EOF, this hardly
"Chad Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch modifies the ReadStr function in pg_backup_archiver.c to validate
> the result of *AH->ReadBufPtr matches the value of l.
If we're trying to defend against premature EOF, this hardly seems like
a sufficient patch.
rega
