"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
> The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
I've been working through this, and found a couple items that seem like
judgment calls:
* Is there a good reason for formatt
"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be worth mentioning that columns appearing in predicates
> of partial indexes and expressions of expression indexes are also
> checked. If any of these columns are changed, HOT update is not done.
In discussion a question arose. I don't thi
Chris Browne wrote:
Similarly, does it seem likely that Slony-I users would need to worry
about this?
No.. it should have zero negative effects for Slony-I. In fact, it will
be an advantage in some cases I think. I remember something about
troubles with Slony-I if the in-use xids on a intermedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Florian G. Pflug") writes:
> Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>> On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
>>> The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
>>> (I seems I still can't ge
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> It would be worth mentioning that columns appearing in predicates
> of partial indexes and expressions of expression indexes are also
> checked. If any of these columns are changed, HOT update is not done.
Added now:
Tuples are checked against expression and
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have taken this, and Pavan's documentation about CREATE INDEX, and
> > worked up an updated README. Comments? Corrections?
>
> Oh, you I think the CREATE INDEX documentation you refer to was actually the
> one I sugge
On 9/4/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have taken this, and Pavan's documentation about CREATE INDEX, and
> worked up an updated README. Comments? Corrections?
Thanks Bruce, Heikki, Greg for helping me with the documentation.
> The requirements for doing a HOT update is
On 9/4/07, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> NOTE: This is something likely to change. Current discussions are leading
> towards handling DELETE_IN_PROGRESS and INSERT_IN_PROGRESS from other
> transactions. We would do this by waiting until the transactions owning
> those
> tuples exi
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I don't think so. The interactions should be pretty minimal.
Thats good news!
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
I haven't been able to follow
"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
>> The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
>> (I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
>>
>
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
> The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
> (I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
>
>
I haven't been able to follow the discussi
Hi
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
Most changes are just small fixes and tweaks. Those are
.) Introduced %v for log_line_prefix
.) I missed a few
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 8/31/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
works fine (here was my test). thank
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have taken this, and Pavan's documentation about CREATE INDEX, and
> worked up an updated README. Comments? Corrections?
Oh, you I think the CREATE INDEX documentation you refer to was actually the
one I suggested.
A few tweaks:
> (If we find a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please see the version 14 of HOT patch attached.
>>> I expected to find either a large new README, or some pretty substantial
>>> additions to existing README files, to document
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> Here's an updated version of the README I posted earlier. It now
>> reflects the changes to how pruning works.
>
> I have taken this, and Pavan's documentation about CREATE INDEX, and
> worked up an updated README. Comme
17 matches
Mail list logo
