On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
Thank you very much. This helps, but I'm still evaluating how much.
I *can* point at one problem though: you do a strchr(gbuf.value,
'@')
and then error out if there isn't a Kerberos realm there. In fact
that
is e
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Bernd Helmle wrote:
> Please find attached a tiny patch which adds a "Login" field to the \du
> command, displaying
Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Following patch implements configurable penalty costs for levenshtein
>> distance metric in fuzzystrmatch contrib module.
> Is there a problem with the patch? Would anybody mind helping me to
> figure out the
Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Following patch implements configurable penalty costs for levenshtein
> > distance metric in fuzzystrmatch contrib module.
>
> Is there a problem with the patch? Would anybody mind helping me to
> figure out the reason of this la
Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Following patch implements configurable penalty costs for levenshtein
> distance metric in fuzzystrmatch contrib module.
Is there a problem with the patch? Would anybody mind helping me to
figure out the reason of this lack of interest, after 15 days.
Thank you very much. This helps, but I'm still evaluating how much.
I *can* point at one problem though: you do a strchr(gbuf.value,
'@') and then error out if there isn't a Kerberos realm there. In
fact that is exactly the default username of at least one of the
GSSAPI implementations I
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> Thank you very much. This helps, but I'm still evaluating how much.
>
> I *can* point at one problem though: you do a strchr(gbuf.value, '@')
> and then error out if there isn't a Kerberos realm there. In fact that
> is exactly the default username of at least one of the
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am sendin actualised czech FAQ. It was updated, encoded to utf8 and
> checked by spellckecker
Thanks, applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Also the elog message texts need a bit of copy-editing.
>
>> Probably ;-) Got any specific hints, so I don't have to go through the
>> iteration twice?
>
> The one that caught my eye was
>
> "SSPI d
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also the elog message texts need a bit of copy-editing.
> Probably ;-) Got any specific hints, so I don't have to go through the
> iteration twice?
The one that caught my eye was
"SSPI domain (%s) does and configured d
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Attached patch implements krb_match_realm for krb5, gssapi and sspi per
>> complaint from Henry. Comments welcome.
>
> Minor gripe: "krb_match_realm" sounds like it should be a boolean:
> do or don't check the realm. Would just "krb
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached patch implements krb_match_realm for krb5, gssapi and sspi per
> complaint from Henry. Comments welcome.
Minor gripe: "krb_match_realm" sounds like it should be a boolean:
do or don't check the realm. Would just "krb_realm" be sensible?
Also
Attached patch implements krb_match_realm for krb5, gssapi and sspi per
complaint from Henry. Comments welcome.
Working on documentation which will of course be ready when it's
committed :)
Oh, and it changes the krb username handling to be the same as the
gssapi one. I've never heard of anybody
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The previous discussion centered around working on on locking in
> dependency.c whilst dropping related objects - but does this apply when
> there is just one? Anyway I tried to understand what was happening and
> the attached rather hacky patch seems
Tom Lane wrote:
Still in the think-about-it mode, personally ... my proposed fix is
certainly much too invasive to consider back-patching, so unless someone
comes up with a way-simpler idea, it's 8.3 material at best ...
I ran into a variant of this today - simply creating and dropping
15 matches
Mail list logo
