Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -((double) (int32) (recptr.xrecoff -
> > ckpt_start_recptr.xrecoff)) / XLogSegSize) /
> > +((double) recptr.xrecoff - (double) ckpt_start_recptr.xrecoff)
> > / XLogSegSize) /
>
> Sure
ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - ((double) (int32) (recptr.xrecoff -
> ckpt_start_recptr.xrecoff)) / XLogSegSize) /
> + ((double) recptr.xrecoff - (double) ckpt_start_recptr.xrecoff)
> / XLogSegSize) /
Surely this makes matters worse, not better. What h
I run long DBT-2 with 8.3beta2 and saw checkpoint spikes periodically.
The progress against WAL segments consumption *jumped up* in such cases.
It seems to be a miscalculation in IsCheckpointOnSchedule().
xrecoff is uint32, therefore the difference of two xrecoffs could
be between -4G and +4G. We
Greg Sabino Mullane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Per a recent bug in which the planner can behave very differently at <
> 100, and accounting for the fact that analyze is still plenty fast on
> today's systems even at a tenfold increase, attached is a patch to
> change default_statistics_target fr
Per a recent bug in which the planner can behave very differently at <
100, and accounting for the fact that analyze is still plenty fast on
today's systems even at a tenfold increase, attached is a patch to
change default_statistics_target from 10 to 100.
Index: doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
=
> + defstring = defGetString(defel);
> + if (pg_strcasecmp(defstring, "True") == 0)
> + d->acceptAll = true;
> + else if (pg_strcasecmp(defstring, "False") == 0)
> + d->acceptAll = fa
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I assume we were only missing the dict_*/README additions.
You are entirely mistaken. There are missing updates in at least
README.pg_standby, README.pageinspect, README.intarray, README.pgbench;
and README.pgrowlocks is sufficiently confused that it
I started importing the files when I notified the list, can't remember exactly
when and I've iteratively improved all the files so there can be differences
though I thought that contrib READMES where very stable. Anyway, I'll try to
take a look at the diffs from then and add those changes.
A Di
Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Cervera i Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [ contrib sgml docs ]
>
> I am distressed to discover that these seem to have been generated from
> a snapshot taken some time in June, as they are missing the last five
> months' worth of changes to the now-deleted README fi
Tom Lane wrote:
Albert Cervera i Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ contrib sgml docs ]
I am distressed to discover that these seem to have been generated from
a snapshot taken some time in June, as they are missing the last five
months' worth of changes to the now-deleted README fi
Albert Cervera i Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ contrib sgml docs ]
I am distressed to discover that these seem to have been generated from
a snapshot taken some time in June, as they are missing the last five
months' worth of changes to the now-deleted README files.
On 13/11/2007, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I've modified Pavel's version into something that seems to support this
> > approach --- at least I can load the 8.2 tsearch regression test
> > database into 8.3 after loading this. Still needs some polishing
> > probably, and some
I wrote:
> I've modified Pavel's version into something that seems to support this
> approach --- at least I can load the 8.2 tsearch regression test
> database into 8.3 after loading this. Still needs some polishing
> probably, and some more testing. Comments?
I've committed this, replacing the
Am Montag, 12. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers.
> >
> > There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8. Please don't do that; it would
> > confuse user
14 matches
Mail list logo
