Hi Magnus, and Dave.
It seems that it is different in nmake although the initial value of
VisualStudio is embedding. Then, It sees a reference problem by
the dll independent. Therefore, embedding considers like an ideal.
Please take this into consideration.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
win32mak
Hi Magnus.
From: "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I see the problem now. In my dev kit, there is no error for using
_USE_32BIT_TIME_T on Win64. That's why I got caught up in your patch being
wrong.
Umm,... It is very strange.?_?
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\include\crtd
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch which fixes an oversight in _outAgg(): the
> "grpColIdx" and "grpOperators" fields of the Agg struct were not emitted
> by _outAgg(). I don't see any good reason to omit this information.
Hmm, I think that must be my fault, but I'm not
Attached is a patch which fixes an oversight in _outAgg(): the
"grpColIdx" and "grpOperators" fields of the Agg struct were not emitted
by _outAgg(). I don't see any good reason to omit this information.
Note that while the "grpOperators" field was added during the 8.3 devel
cycle, the "grpColIdx"
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be a good idea to keep removing redundant clauses and rethink
> the preference for clauseful joins, going forward?
No --- it would create an exponential growth in planning time for large
join problems, while not actually buying anything in the
Tom Lane wrote:
> Comparing the behavior of this to my patch for HEAD, I am coming to the
> conclusion that this is actually a *better* planning method than
> removing the redundant join conditions, even when they're truly
> rendundant! The reason emerges as soon as you look at cases involving
>
I wrote:
> Haven't looked closely at how to fix 8.2, yet.
After some study it seems that the simplest, most reliable fix for 8.2
is to dike out the code that removes "redundant" outer join conditions
after propagating a constant across them. This gives the right answer
in the cases of concern (wh
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:02:24AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:19:54AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> >>Ummm, Sorry...former patch to be disregarded.
> >>Although 64bit mak is
