Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean about TEXT being null-safe.
What are the issues, and why was
it supported for years and now abruptly changed.
It never was supported, we are simply plugging a hole that let you
create a text
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean about TEXT being null-safe.
What are the issues, and why was
it supported for years and now abruptly changed.
It never was supported, we are simply plugging a
BAndrew Dunstan wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean about TEXT being null-safe.
What are the issues, and why was
it supported for years and now abruptly changed.
It never
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Hunsaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
create table junk (val integer not null, val2 integer);
create table junk_child () inherits (junk_1);
alter table junk_child alter column val drop not null;
insert into
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it be reasonable to throw a warning if you revoke a privilege from
some role, and that role inherits the privilege from some other role (or
PUBLIC)?
This has been suggested and rejected before --- the consensus is it'd
be too
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Added to TODO:
o Consider using a ring buffer for COPY FROM
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-02/msg00140.php
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Alex Hunsaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually the bug is that ALTER TABLE allows you to do that. It should
not be possible to drop an inherited constraint, but right now there's
not enough information in the system catalogs
A quick recap: I submitted a patch for empty ARRAY[] syntax back in
November, and as far as I can see it never made it to the patches
list. Gregory suggested a different way of approaching the problem
(quoted below), but nobody commented further about how it might be
made to work.
I'd like to
I have applied the attached documentation patch to show ts_headline()
using a configuration name.
---
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Stephen Davies wrote:
As it turns out, all I needed was in the doco but
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
17 matches
Mail list logo
