Re: [PATCHES] WIP: guc enums

2008-03-04 Thread Tom Lane
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On my platform (linux x86) it works fine when I just cast this to (int *), >> but I'm unsure if that's going to be safe on other platforms. I had some >> indication that it's probably not? > No, I don't think that's safe.

Re: [PATCHES] libpq.so linking problem on Solaris using --with-gssapi

2008-03-04 Thread Tom Lane
Bjorn Munch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The fix is simply to add "-lgss" to the list, as the attached patch > does. I'm pretty sure no other Makefiles are affected. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)

Re: [PATCHES] actualized SQL/PSM patch

2008-03-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Pa

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: guc enums

2008-03-04 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Magnus Hagander wrote: The patch only converts a couple of the potential enum variables to the new type, mainly as a proof of concept. But already I hit the problem twice - the variable that holds the value of the guc enum is a C enum itself, which gives a compiler warning when I pass a pointer t

Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds

2008-03-04 Thread Zoltan Boszormenyi
Alvaro Herrera írta: Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: attached is our patch against HEAD which enables extending CommandIds to 64-bit. This is for enabling long transactions that really do that much non-read-only work in one transaction. I think you should add a pg_control field and correspo

[PATCHES] actualized SQL/PSM patch

2008-03-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello I actualized sql/psm patch. This patch can be downloaded from http://www.pgsql.cz/patches/plpgpsm.diff.gz Documentation is on wiki http://www.pgsql.cz/index.php/SQL/PSM_Manual Regards Pavel Stehule -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to yo

Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds

2008-03-04 Thread Zoltan Boszormenyi
Alvaro Herrera írta: Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: attached is our patch against HEAD which enables extending CommandIds to 64-bit. This is for enabling long transactions that really do that much non-read-only work in one transaction. I think you should add a pg_control field and correspo

Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds

2008-03-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > attached is our patch against HEAD which enables extending CommandIds > to 64-bit. This is for enabling long transactions that really do that much > non-read-only work in one transaction. I think you should add a pg_control field and corresponding check, to avoid a 64b

[PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds

2008-03-04 Thread Zoltan Boszormenyi
Hi, attached is our patch against HEAD which enables extending CommandIds to 64-bit. This is for enabling long transactions that really do that much non-read-only work in one transaction. The feature is off by default, you need to --enable-huge-commandid. It fails only one regression test (witho

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for initdb failures on Vista

2008-03-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:28:30PM +, Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Will you provide a patch for that, or should I? (I remind you I have no > > box ready to reproduce it on, so it helps a lot if you can do it :-P) > > Patch

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for initdb failures on Vista

2008-03-04 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Will you provide a patch for that, or should I? (I remind you I have no > box ready to reproduce it on, so it helps a lot if you can do it :-P) Patch attached. Tested on XP and Vista. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Show INHERIT in \du

2008-03-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Br

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Show INHERIT in \du

2008-03-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Brendan Jurd escribi?: > > I've done up a patch per Tom's idea of combining the binary role > > attributes into a single column. > > This patch seems to be missing from the queue. Yes because I am still processing email from two weeks ago. I was in Europe for a week. --

[PATCHES] WIP: guc enums

2008-03-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
Attached is my first work at implementing GUC enums. It's not done yet, obviously, but I did hit a problem that I need to ask about. So I'll just send what I have now for comments. The patch only converts a couple of the potential enum variables to the new type, mainly as a proof of concept. But a

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Show INHERIT in \du

2008-03-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Brendan Jurd escribió: > I've done up a patch per Tom's idea of combining the binary role > attributes into a single column. This patch seems to be missing from the queue. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom D

[PATCHES] libpq.so linking problem on Solaris using --with-gssapi

2008-03-04 Thread Bjorn Munch
When building PostgreSQL 8.3 on Solaris using the configure option "--with-gssapi", libpq.so is not linked correctly. This line in the libpq Makefile is selecting the appropriate linker options: --- SHLIB_LINK += $(filter -lcrypt -ldes -lcom_err -lcrypto -lk5crypto -lkrb5 -lgssapi_krb5 -lssl -ls