Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: After reading this for awhile, I realized that there is a rather fundamental problem with it: it switches into consistent recovery mode as soon as it's read WAL beyond ControlFile-minRecoveryPoint. In a

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] get_relation_stats_hook()

2008-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: New version of Postgres patch, v5. Implements suggested changes. Ready for review and apply. Applied with some revisions. The method for passing back freefunc didn't work, so I made it pass the whole VariableStatsData struct instead; this might allow some

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-28 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 14:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: It does nothing AFAICS for the problem that when restarting archive recovery from a restartpoint, it's not clear when it is safe to start letting in backends. You need to get past the highest LSN that has made it out to disk, and there is

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It does nothing AFAICS for the problem that when restarting archive recovery from a restartpoint, it's not clear when it is safe to start letting in backends. You need to get past the highest LSN that has made it out to disk, and there is no good way to

Re: [PATCHES] [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]

2008-09-28 Thread Ryan Bradetich
Hello all, Just wanted to let everyone know I have committed this patch to the PgFoundry uint project. I have also updated the commit-fest wiki with this status. Thanks to everyone (especially Jaime) for the feedback and reviews. - Ryan -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list