>>> "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We really need a more reliable way of detecting that a file has been
> fully copied.
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive directory and doing a mv to the
archive location when
>>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2008 at 7:20 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There was a serious performance regression in OUTER JOIN planning
>> going from 8.2.
>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2007 at 7:02 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Simon Riggs"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 17:04 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> I'm submitting this patch in attempt to clarify some issues with the
&g
I'm submitting this patch in attempt to clarify some issues with the
warm standby documentation which caused some confusion in our
organization and which have been recently discussed on the admin list.
I apologize for posting twice, but I noticed that my pseudo-code
was unnecessarily long and comp
I'm submitting this patch in attempt to clarify some issues with the
warm standby documentation which caused some confusion in our
organization and which have been recently discussed on the admin list.
-Kevin
Index: backup.sgml
===
>>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2006 at 12:26 pm, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Magnus
Hagander"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And finally, the error handling looks a bit off? We specifically
*don't*
> want it to log an error for the WSAECONNRESET state - it's a normal
> state. Or am I reading the patch wro
>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 7:58 pm, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian
wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But not once per statement --- in reality, you get a fairly
arbitrary
>> behavior that will advance in some cases and not others when
dealing
>> with a multi- statement querystring.
>
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 1:13 pm, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kevin Grittner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attachment didn't seem to go through. Embedding below.
Index: mvcc.sgml
===
R
Attached is a patch for the documentation. We currently state that we
don't know of any production DBMS which uses predicate locking. Current
versions of at least two commercial products (Sybase ASE and Microsoft
SQL Server) do use it. I believe this has been true since 1990 or
earlier.
If peop
The attached patch combines work from two patches recently posted by
Bruce Momjian, along with a necessary change to guc.c which is missing
from those patches.
Please ignore all prior patches with this subject line and consider
this a rollup.
-Kevin
standard-conforming-strings4.patch
Descripti
10 matches
Mail list logo
