Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marshall, Steve wrote:
The recent TCL patch assumed Tcl_NotifierProcs.initNotifierProc
was added in TCL 8.2:
In fact it was added in 8.4 so I have modified the CVS with
the following patch.
I confirmed this against the 8.2.5 release. Sorry I did not notice
I'm fine with Tom's wording and placement.
This seems a bit wordy, as well as wrongly placed --- the time to tell
people they need a non-multithreaded Tcl is in the installation
instructions. I added the following instead.
regards, tom lane
The recent TCL patch assumed Tcl_NotifierProcs.initNotifierProc
was added in TCL 8.2:
In fact it was added in 8.4 so I have modified the CVS with
the following patch.
I confirmed this against the 8.2.5 release. Sorry I did not notice that
when I initially created the patch.
While the patch
: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:33 PM
To: Marshall, Steve
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming
multithreaded
Marshall, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a problem in PL/TCL that can cause the postgres backend to
become
There is a problem in PL/TCL that can cause the postgres backend to
become multithreaded. Postgres is not designed to be multithreaded, so
this causes downstream errors in signal handling. We have seen this
cause a number of unexpected state errors associated with notification
handling;
