On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Affan Salman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With some time to spare, I thought I'd submit a quick-fix patch to the
> > issue I reported here:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-07/msg00339.php
>
> I don't think this is right. If t
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/8/06, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What feature though? Part of the definition of a feature like synonym has
> > to nail down things like how it interacts with search path
>
>
> I've s
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/8/06, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, however there are two slightly separate discussions going on and I
> > think you're taking them as a single discussion.
>
>
> I agree that th
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/8/06, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't that pretty much go against the (I thought) outstanding behavioral
> > question of whether the synonyms are scoped and obey search path? If they
> &
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>I'd personally be more inte
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:39:55PM -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd personally be more interested in what the impact is on people not
> > using synonyms. How free is any search for synonyms if you aren't using
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig wrote:
> > The semantics of namespace search seem wrong; I would think that a
> > synonym in schema A should mask a table in schema B if A precedes B
> > on the search path, but this doesn't work that way.
>
> good point.
> any other opionions
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> Here's my current work in progress for 8.1 devel related to fixing the
> timing issues with referential actions having their checks run on
> intermediate states. I've only put in a simple test that failed against
> 8.0 in th
Here's my current work in progress for 8.1 devel related to fixing the
timing issues with referential actions having their checks run on
intermediate states. I've only put in a simple test that failed against
8.0 in the regression patch and regression still passes for me. There's
still an outsta
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> That would answer the big question here, but where does it say that?
> >
> > Also, if you really insist on an authoritative statement, try this text
> > (from Annex D of the C99 draft standard, "Formal model of sequence
> > poin
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> >> I would posit that this is the desired behavior as it's consistent with
> >> every language I can think of.
>
> >
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > The patch treats any non-zero value as "true". Is that the behavior we
> > want, or should we only allow "1" as an integer representation of
> > "true"? (I'm not sure myself, I just don't think copying C here is
> > necessarily the best guide.)
>
> I
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:39:38AM -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
> >
> > > I've attached a corrected patch, the postgresql.pc.in was missing.
> > >
> &g
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Czuczy Gergely wrote:
> I've attached a corrected patch, the postgresql.pc.in was missing.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 01:49:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Czuczy Gergely) writes:
> > > I've added a pkg-config script.
> > > The "diff -rc -x configure from
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> > What we probably want instead is a separate
> > redirect_stderr_to_files boolean (I'm sure a better name could be
> > thought of).
> >
> > Also, while I'm aware that a superuser can persuade the backend to write
> > on anything, it doesn't follow that
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Walter wrote:
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Walter wrote:
> > >
> > > "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > Uh, I have never heard of Digital Mars C++. I see it
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > CREATE USER calvin WITH IN GROUP admin, CREATEDB;
> > ERROR: group "admin" does not exist
> >
> > CREATE USER calvin WITH IN GROUP admin CREATEDB foo;
> > ERROR: syntax error at or near "foo" at character 49
> > HINT: other us
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'd suggest something along the lines of
> >>
> >> NOTICE: foreign key constraint "constrname" will require a cross-type conversion
> >> DETAIL: key columns "fkcol" and "pkcol" are of different
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > > Here is a proposed patch against 7.4.1 to check exact match
> > > of foreign key types wrt the referenced keys, and to show
> > > a warning if this is not the case.
> >
> > I think that this concern may be obsolete in CVS tip,
>
> I just get the curre
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I create a plpgsql function for grant rights for the postgres users.
> The same function is working properly in the previous versions. But it
> gives the following error message.
You're not putting in the schema names in your grant statements so t
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't know of a memcpy() implementation that would actually bail out
> > if called with two equal pointers, but perhaps there is one in
> > existence somewhere.
>
> This isn't a bug, and I see no reason to clutter
Here's a patch that adds some text mentioning that
RESTRICT is not deferrable to the create table reference
page.Index: doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml,
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Can you tell me what Win32 compile environment can't handle a sizeof()
> as a function parameter?
>
> ! GetUserName(pw->pw_name, sizeof(pw->pw_name)-1);
>
> Does casting to DWORD help?
> > ! GetUserName(pw->pw_name, &pwname_size);
It looks
The deferred trigger queue pushing to disk patch pointed out
that the regression tests for foreign keys didn't seem to test
a deferred constraint that was not satisified by a later
statement and was not made immediate by set constraints,
so here's a simple added test with a single invalid insert a
25 matches
Mail list logo
