Nice, thanks a lot.
Tom Lane wrote:
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just a freshing for clean applying..
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.11.gz
Applied with some revisions, and pg_dump support and regression tests
added.
regards, tom lane
---
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a freshing for clean applying..
> http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.11.gz
Applied with some revisions, and pg_dump support and regression tests
added.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broad
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a freshing for clean applying..
> http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.11.gz
> Is any objections to commit?
There's still a lot I don't particularly care for here (lack of
documentation being the biggest), but I'll make a pass at cleaning
Just a freshing for clean applying..
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.11.gz
Is any objections to commit?
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
-
0.9 doesn't apply cleanly after Peter's changes, so, new version
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.10.gz
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>> Perhaps an array of int4 would be better? How much
Done
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.9.gz
The patch needs more cleanup before
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Perhaps an array of int4 would be better? How much
> Done
> http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.9.gz
>>> The patch needs more cleanup before applying, too, eg make comments
>>> match code, get rid of unused keywords added to gram.y.
> Cl
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:04:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1) Typmod for user-defined types
> >http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/user_defined_typmod-0.7.gz
> >Patch is based on ideas from
> >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-06/msg0
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:35:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 3) Allow to use index for IS [NOT] NULL
> >http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/indexnulls_82-0.6.gz
> >Initially patch was developed by Martijn van Oosterhout
> > .
> >But it's reworked and support of searching NULLS to GiST too. Pat
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> but the real problem is that there's no way for the planner
>> to reason about ordering in this representation. This patch would
>> guarantee that an ORDER BY with the NULLS option couldn't use an
>> indexscan, even if the index sorts nulls at the corre
