Tom Lane wrote:
Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local SSL installation hasn't
got it. Per buildfarm failure on 'canary'.
It seems a little bit dangerous to just not check the CRL without so much
as a
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
a log message that it was skipped.
I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
a log message that it was skipped.
I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
silly enough to think his ancient SSL library
pgman wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
a log message that it was skipped.
I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
silly enough to think his
