Bruce Momjian writes:
> Guys, is this patch ready for application? I think so, but am not 100%
> sure.
I haven't read the code yet, but in any case I still object to choosing
Oracle-like names for Oracle-incompatible functionality. We need to
settle on better names.
reg
Hello,
I changed code by your and Neil's notes. The name SQLCODE isn't well,
better is SQLSTATE. It's very similar DB2 variable. I am not sure, so my
solutions is best. Propably not. It's only particular solution for
plpgsql. The files plpgsql.sql and plpgsql.out are diffs for regression
tests.
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Is there a reason why you've made the type of SQLCODE `text', rather
> than integer?
The value isn't an integer ... which gets back to my point that this is
not compatible with Oracle's idea of SQLCODE and therefore we should *not*
use that name for it.
Hello,
I used different format now. Documentation:
This patch is implementation of variables SQLERRM and SQLCODE for plpgsql
language. Variable SQLCODE contains five chars PostgreSQL Error Code,
SQLERRM contains relevant message last catched exception. All variables
are attached to plpgsql_blo
>
> I think we discussed this last year and decided that it would be a bad
> idea to use those names because Oracle's use of them is not exactly
> compatible with our error codes and messages. SQLCODE in particular is
> not compatible at all --- it's an integer in Oracle, isn't it?
There is more
Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is my second patch, than please will be tolerant :-). For one my
> project I miss information about exception when I use EXCEPTION WITH
> OTHERS THEN. I found two Oracle's varaibles SQLCODE and SQLERRM which
> carry this information.
I think we
