Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's partially redundant, but only partially, and I agree that it'll
>> probably be easier for people to use than the catversion number.
> Also, that macro block where Joe Conway compared catalog version numbers
> and defined understandable macro names c
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, updated version of the patch attached and applied.
>
> > I still object to this. What is wrong with using the catalog version
> > number?
>
> It's partially redundant, but only partially, and I agre
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, updated version of the patch attached and applied.
> I still object to this. What is wrong with using the catalog version
> number?
It's partially redundant, but only partially, and I agree that it'll
probably be easier
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > -- Start of PGP signed section.
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:45:18AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I have developed a patch which creates a new pg_config.h define
> > > > called PG_VERSION_NUM, which
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
>
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:45:18AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I have developed a patch which creates a new pg_config.h define
> > > called PG_VERSION_NUM, which is a number like 80200, with no
> > >
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:45:18AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I have developed a patch which creates a new pg_config.h define called
> > PG_VERSION_NUM, which is a number like 80200, with no beta/devel
> > designation. I thi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:45:18AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I have developed a patch which creates a new pg_config.h define called
> PG_VERSION_NUM, which is a number like 80200, with no beta/devel
> designation. I think this will be helpful (eventually) for people
> writing plug-ins. Att
I have developed a patch which creates a new pg_config.h define called
PG_VERSION_NUM, which is a number like 80200, with no beta/devel
designation. I think this will be helpful (eventually) for people
writing plug-ins. Attached.
-
