Neil Conway wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 13:07 +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I did some patches for 7.4 and 8.0 a while ago (attached) - while I do
not expect these to be applied
Right, I don't see a need to backport this.
is there somewhere for things like this to go?
Pg Foundry?
Of
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 13:07 +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I did some patches for 7.4 and 8.0 a while ago (attached) - while I do
> not expect these to be applied
Right, I don't see a need to backport this.
> is there somewhere for things like this to go?
Pg Foundry?
-Neil
--
Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This patch changes the use of numeric to int8 to represent the
relblocknumber column.
Applied, thanks.
This reminds me:
I did some patches for 7.4 and 8.0 a while ago (attached) - while I do
not expect these to be applied (unles
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch changes the use of numeric to int8 to represent the
> relblocknumber column.
Applied, thanks.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I couldn't use int4 as the underlying datatype is unsigned int (not
available as exposed Pg type). However, using int8 sounds promising
(is int8 larger than unsigned int on 64-bit platforms?).
Blocknumber is defined as uint32 in block.h - so shoul
