Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears
> some may have been lost. Here's the second of three.
>
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> I'm going to resend t
I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears
some may have been lost. Here's the second of three.
Nabil Sayegh wrote:
Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.09 schrieb Joe Conway:
Sounds like all that's needed for your case. But t
I can not find any patch from that date with your name on it, and I
can't find a patch at all with connectby from you.
Of course, please repost it if you have it (archives are down), but then
again, where has the patch gone? Why isn't it in my mailbox?
--
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Joe, would you comment on this change to tablefunc connectby?
I actually tied up a few loose ends on this and submitted it to PATCHES
on 6/26/2003. See:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00357.php
Joe
---(end of broadcast)
Joe, would you comment on this change to tablefunc connectby?
---
Nabil Sayegh wrote:
> Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.09 schrieb Joe Conway:
>
> > Sounds like all that's needed for your case. But to be complete, in
> > addition
Nabil Sayegh wrote:
Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.09 schrieb Joe Conway:
Sounds like all that's needed for your case. But to be complete, in
addition to changing tablefunc.c we'd have to:
1) come up with a new function call signature that makes sense and does
not cause backward compatibility problems
