Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Marko Kreen") writes:
> > > Even the realistic code may be too much for general docs,
> > > but considering this is not a functionality covered
> > > by general SQL textbooks, I think it is worth havin
On 10/17/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks. Here is a version with your changes applied, plus
> > minor code cleanup and example output.
>
> I can't really see the reasoning for putting this into the PG
> documentation. It's tremendousl
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks. Here is a version with your changes applied, plus
> minor code cleanup and example output.
I can't really see the reasoning for putting this into the PG
documentation. It's tremendously complicated and doesn't seem like
something very many peop
On 10/16/07, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Marko Kreen") writes:
> > Even the realistic code may be too much for general docs,
> > but considering this is not a functionality covered
> > by general SQL textbooks, I think it is worth having.
> >
> > I also put rendere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Marko Kreen") writes:
> Even the realistic code may be too much for general docs,
> but considering this is not a functionality covered
> by general SQL textbooks, I think it is worth having.
>
> I also put rendered pages up here:
>
> http://skytools.projects.postgresql.org/txi
Although the new txid functions are very clean 1:1 interface
to the internal MVCC info and they don't need much docs
in that respect, their "killer" usage comes from the
possibility to query txids committed between 2 snapshots.
But how to do that (efficiently) is far from obvious when
just looking
