Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

2005-01-21 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 January 2005 14:01 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in >

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

2005-01-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Dave Page said: > >> >> Hmm: >> >> Windows: >> >> VOID Sleep(DWORD dwMilliseconds); >> >> Unix: >> >> unsigned int sleep(unsigned int seconds); >> >> D'oh! >> >> Patch coming up > We should not be using either of these, should we? pg_usleep() is platform independent. cheers andrew --

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

2005-01-21 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Dave Page > Sent: 21 January 2005 13:20 > To: Harald Massa; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in less than 1 > second with pg_autovacuum > > > > > -Origin