Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW I've got serious reservations about whether this bit is safe:
+ /* The table could've grown since vacuum started, and
there
+* might already be dead tuples on the new pages. Catch
them
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have two runs of DBT-2, one with the patch and one without.
Patched:
autovac public.stock scans:1 pages:1285990(-0)
tuples:25303056(-2671265) CPU 95.22s/38.02u sec elapsed 10351.17 sec
Unpatched:
autovac public.stock
