Re: [PATCHES] Ant version detection

2003-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
Johann Uhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Johann Uhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> ... Therefore, only lines >>> beginning with "Apache Ant version" should be considered. >> >> Do *all* versions of Ant identify themselves that way? I'd be inclined >> to write >> grep -

Re: [PATCHES] Ant version detection

2003-10-23 Thread Barry Lind
Johann, I would suggest putting together a rough proposal of what functionality you want to add (and if appropriate how you want to add it) and send it to the pgsql-jdbc mail list. Then incorporate the feedback you get from the community. thanks, --Barry Johann Uhrmann wrote: Tom Lane wrote:

Re: [PATCHES] Ant version detection

2003-10-23 Thread Johann Uhrmann
Tom Lane wrote: Johann Uhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... Therefore, only lines beginning with "Apache Ant version" should be considered. Do *all* versions of Ant identify themselves that way? I'd be inclined to write grep -i "ant version" instead. I agree, that seems a lot more st

Re: [PATCHES] Ant version detection

2003-10-22 Thread Tom Lane
Johann Uhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... Therefore, only lines > beginning with "Apache Ant version" should be considered. Do *all* versions of Ant identify themselves that way? I'd be inclined to write grep -i "ant version" instead. > The second one is a missing semicolon. I am

[PATCHES] Ant version detection

2003-10-22 Thread Johann Uhrmann
Hello, this is the first time I am dealing with the Postgres source. Therefore, I am hoping this is the right place to propose a patch. The patch is to be applied to the current CVS source. This is it: Index: configure === RCS file: