Russell Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 03:51 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > The following patch disables WAL backup pages when fsync is off.
> >
> > This is a good idea why?
> >
> If it is, why do we write wal at all if fsync is off?
Good question. WAL is to recover the
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > The following patch disables WAL backup pages when fsync is off.
>
> This is a good idea why?
There is no need to write backup pages if fsync is off. Our TODO has:
* Turn off after-change writes if fsync is disabled
If fsync is off
Bruce Momjian writes:
> The following patch disables WAL backup pages when fsync is off.
This is a good idea why?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister comma
The following patch disables WAL backup pages when fsync is off.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.| Newtow