Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Agreed we have to show both. The question is whether we should prefer
> single quotes and switch to $$ only when a single quote exists in the
> body, or use $$ in most cases. Of course CREATE FUNCTION should show
> that both are possible, as well as $tag$.
My take: If there
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 6-May-04, at 12:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK. I am just afraid if we show 4 functions, and three use $$, and one
> >> doesn't use single-quotes inside, so we quote with single-quotes, that
> >> it would look strange.
>
> > Pe
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6-May-04, at 12:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK. I am just afraid if we show 4 functions, and three use $$, and one
>> doesn't use single-quotes inside, so we quote with single-quotes, that
>> it would look strange.
> Personally I don't think it woul
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:47:46AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On 6-May-04, at 12:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > OK. I am just afraid if we show 4 functions, and three use $$,
> > > and one doesn't use single-quotes inside, so we quote with
> > > single-quotes, that it
Neil Conway wrote:
> On 6-May-04, at 12:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK. I am just afraid if we show 4 functions, and three use $$, and one
> > doesn't use single-quotes inside, so we quote with single-quotes, that
> > it would look strange.
>
> Personally I don't think it would look that stra
On 6-May-04, at 12:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK. I am just afraid if we show 4 functions, and three use $$, and one
doesn't use single-quotes inside, so we quote with single-quotes, that
it would look strange.
Personally I don't think it would look that strange, but maybe that's
just me. Does a
Neil Conway wrote:
> On 5-May-04, at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I disagree. I think swiching between single quote and $$ based on the
> > content is just too confusing. I would just use $$ in all cases unless
> > $$ appears in the function (which should be rare), in which case I
> > would
On 5-May-04, at 11:32 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, we need to show that it can be varied, but when we are trying to
illustrate another concept, we should show examples that highlight
that concept, not add additional complexity with showing we can put a
tag between $$. My guess is that if we show
On 5-May-04, at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I disagree. I think swiching between single quote and $$ based on the
content is just too confusing. I would just use $$ in all cases unless
$$ appears in the function (which should be rare), in which case I
would
use $quote$ or something generic.
We
David Fetter wrote:
> You folks have commit privs, so please settle on something.
>
> Here's $.01 worth:
>
> It ought to be pretty clear in each example that the stuff between the
> $'s can be varied.
Yes, we need to show that it can be varied, but when we are trying to
illustrate another concep
David Fetter wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:42:56AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
On 5-May-04, at 2:26 AM, David Fetter wrote:
Here it is :)
Looks good for the most part. A few minor quibbles / suggestions:
- Where an example uses double-quotes in a funct
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:42:56AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On 5-May-04, at 2:26 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Here it is :)
> >
> > Looks good for the most part. A few minor quibbles / suggestions:
> >
> > - Where an example uses double-quotes in a function body, we o
Neil Conway wrote:
> On 5-May-04, at 2:26 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > Here it is :)
>
> Looks good for the most part. A few minor quibbles / suggestions:
>
> - Where an example uses double-quotes in a function body, we ought to
> change the example to use dollar quoting -- but if no doubled-quot
On 5-May-04, at 2:26 AM, David Fetter wrote:
Here it is :)
Looks good for the most part. A few minor quibbles / suggestions:
- Where an example uses double-quotes in a function body, we ought to
change the example to use dollar quoting -- but if no doubled-quotes
are used, I think it's better to
Neil,
Here it is :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Index: doc/src/sgml/plperl.sgml
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/doc/
15 matches
Mail list logo
