OK, change made and applied.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
>
> > Is 't' for toast tables? If so, we should allow 't
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
> Is 't' for toast tables? If so, we should allow 't', no? I wasn't sure
> about 's'?
Wups, you are right --- I was thinking 't' meant 'composite type'.
The only 's' in the system is
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ! "where reltype not in
> > ('v','c') and "
>
> Surely you meant relkind. Also, there is no 'c' relkind; perhaps you
> meant 's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
Ye
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ! "where reltype not in
> ('v','c') and "
Surely you meant relkind. Also, there is no 'c' relkind; perhaps you
meant 's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
rega
Patch attached and applied.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Kenji Sugita writes:
> >> This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
> >> listing.
>
> > Why
Sorry, patch removed from patch queue.
I will rework the patch to skip views completely, OK?
---
Kenji Sugita wrote:
> This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
> listing.
> Index: oid2name.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Kenji Sugita wrote:
> This small patch el
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kenji Sugita writes:
>> This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
>> listing.
> Why would one want to do that?
AFAICS the point of oid2name is to provide a mapping between disk file
names and table names. As such, wha
Kenji Sugita writes:
> This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
> listing.
Why would one want to do that?
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:32:46 -0400
;;; Kenji Sugita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
;;; > This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2nam
Kenji Sugita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
> listing.
Seems like it'd be a good idea to eliminate views and composite types as
well.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
listing.
Index: oid2name.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/contrib/oid2name/oid2name.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.18 oid2name.c
--- oid2
12 matches
Mail list logo
