Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 07:49:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom Lane wrote: But it'll only be in \dT+ anyway, no? Not in this patch. Hmmm ... given that a long list of enum members would bloat the o

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread David Fetter
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 07:49:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> But it'll only be in \dT+ anyway, no? > > > Not in this patch. > > Hmmm ... given that a long list of enum members would bloat the > output quite a lot, I think I'd vote

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> But it'll only be in \dT+ anyway, no? > Not in this patch. Hmmm ... given that a long list of enum members would bloat the output quite a lot, I think I'd vote for putting it in \dT+. regards, tom lane -- S

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I notice that this patch adds an "Elements" column to the output of \dT, which will only be used by enum types. That seems rather ... cluttered. But it'll only be in \dT+ anyway, no? Not in this

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice that this patch adds an "Elements" column to the output of \dT, > which will only be used by enum types. That seems rather ... cluttered. But it'll only be in \dT+ anyway, no? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patc

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread David Fetter
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 06:40:51PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > David Fetter wrote: >> Folks, >> >> In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find >> patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO >> item: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: Folks, In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO item: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00826.php I notice that this patch adds an "Elements" column to t

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:53:00PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: David Fetter wrote: Folks, In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO item: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-01 Thread David Fetter
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:53:00PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > David Fetter wrote: >> Folks, >> >> In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find >> patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO >> item: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008

Re: [PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-05-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: Folks, In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO item: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00826.php I don't have a particular problem with this patch - indeed

[PATCHES] Fix \dT enum in psql

2008-04-08 Thread David Fetter
Folks, In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO item: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00826.php Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 23